20 May 2026 – 08:36 Central Euro Time

Silver is at present above its Neutral Zone for today, whilst below same is Oil; volatility for the BEGOS Markets is mostly light. The Spoo yesterday settled below its Market Magnet (7416), suggestive of still lower prices near-term; as noted, we’re minding the Spoo’s “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency (see Market Trends) for the Blues to break below the key +80% which now looks to occur as soon as tomorrow, following which price ought further fall; the Blues have not produced a signal for the Spoo since the Long suggestion back on 02 April, price opening that day at 6619. Amongst the five primary BEGOS components, our best correlation remains negative between the Bond and Oil. Nothing is due today for the Econ Baro. And late in the session comes the FOMC Minutes from its 28/29 April meeting.

19 May 2026 – 08:41 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Euro, Swiss Franc, Silver and Copper are all presently below their respective Neutral Zones for today; the other three BEGOS Markets are within same, and volatility is light-to-moderate. At Market Trends, we’re minding the Spoo’s “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency: whilst they remain well-above the key +80% axis, they are nonetheless in the early signs of decline, barring the Spoo racing back up towards its all-time high (7540 v.s current 7409); by Market Rhythms the Spoo’s best for pure swing consistency on a 10-test basis has been the 15mn Price Oscillator, whereas on a 24-test basis ’tis been the 2hr Price Oscillator; and by its Market Profile, the Spoo’s most volume-dominant price of the past fortnight is 7421, which is about the midpoint of today’s trading range thus far. The sole incoming metric today for the Econ Baro is April’s Pending Home Sales.

18 May 2026 – 08:36 Central Euro Time

Presently, the Bond, Copper and Spoo are below today’s Neutral Zones, whilst above same is Oil; BEGOS Markets’ volatility is moderate. The Gold Update sees price’s downtrend as remaining in force, be it by the near-term 21-linreg trend (see Market Trends) or the broader-term weekly Parabolics, the prior week’s rally thus having been one of “relief”. The Spoo appears en route to recording a second consecutive down day, which across the prior 33 trading days (from 31 March) has only twice occurred; the S&P 500 itself of course remains technically overbought through the last 27 trading days as well as fundamentally overvalued, indeed vastly so via the “live” futs-adj’d P/E at this instant of 47.9x. Due for the Econ Baro is the NAHB Housing Index for May. And this is the final week of Q1 Earnings Season.

The Gold Update: No. 861 – (16 May 2026) – “Gold’s Recent Trend Not Much of a Friend”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 861st Edition — Monte-Carlo — 16 May 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Gold’s Recent Trend Not Much of a Friend

“The trend is your friend.”  ‘Tis a time-honoured truism of liquid markets.  And as has basically been the case for these past two months — after Gold in mid-winter flirted about in the 5000s — its “trend” on balance has been down.

Yet herein a week ago, even as Gold’s weekly parabolic trend remained Short (as still ’tis) and 21-day linear regression trend remained negative (as still ’tis), we began to wax at least a wee bit bullish.  For as ’twas pointed out:  Gold’s baby blue dots of regression trend consistency — whilst also still in negative territory — were nonetheless beginning to rise.  And you long-time readers know the drill:  “Follow the ‘Blues’ instead of the news, else lose yer shoes.”

Accordingly so, the precious metals’ “Baby Blues” began turning upward from the open on 07 May with Gold in turn recording a diminutive +1.7% gain from 4702 to 4783 this past Tuesday … and Silver from 77.83 to 90.11 this past Wednesday, a sterling gain of 15.8% in just five days.  Here are the three months of daily bars for Gold on the left and for Silver on the right, the noted respective rallies per each metal’s green line:

But as the balance of this past week further unfolded per the red lines, there was not enough “grunt in the lump” (motor-racing expression) to maintain what now in hindsight (as herein queried a week ago) was indeed a “relief rally”.  For both metals, their overriding weekly parabolic trends have remained Short throughout with Gold sinking into settling yesterday (Friday) at 4544, down as much as -5.6% from its rally peak, and Silver at 76.30, well-down -15.6% from its like peak.  As well, we’ll see if the “Baby Blues” too are to lose.

“Well, that’s not a very friendly trend, mmb…

Squire, it depends upon what side of the trade one is.  Surely for the Gold Bulls, downtrends are a period for patience, perhaps to initially (hat-tip charter reader THR) “take some chips off the table”.  But for the smart alec Shorts, they fawn upon downtrends as friendly until they all get hoovered away within the next dominant up-leg.  (As we ad nauseam quip, “Shorting Gold is a bad idea”).

As to “The Why”, the conventional wisdom of “Dollar strength” gets a degree of just due:  the Dollar Index (aka “Dixie”) traded up to its highest level yesterday since 01 April (no foolin’) of 99.245, and there’s room to further rise a bit more to at least 99.400 which would close the 99.400-to-98.975 technical down gap created back on 08 April.

For those of you scoring at home, too much numerical detail perhaps; but the Buck has been getting the bid, and rightly so:  because surely the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee come their 17 June Policy Statement “ought” vote to raise their Bank’s Funds rate.  We say “ought” as the pressure from the Executive Branch not to so do shall be palpable, (as we X’d [@deMeadvillePro] last Wednesday).  Welcome to the head of the Fed, Chairman Kevin “The Warrior” Warsh:  have a nice term in the political marsh.

Raise rates indeed.  For better than a year we’ve herein suggested that “to raise” is eventual if not imminent, even as the FinMedia and Wall Street have worn blinders throughout in perceiving “how many times the Fed will cut rates this year”.  Wrong.

Honestly folks, at times we feel as if we’re the last remaining analytical entity that engages in actually doing the math.  And the math affirms inflation really and truly is now on the march.  Whilst we still await April’s “Fed-favoured” inflation gauge of Personal Consumption Expenditures (due 28 May), the month’s reported measures at both the retail level (Consumer Price Index) and leading wholesale level (Producer Price Index) came in even further above the Fed’s desired +2% bevel.  Why, the following chart of annualized inflation for the past 12 months has “RAISE!” written all ’round it!

And as is the rule (albeit 2004-2006 was an exception), higher rates make the Dollar more attractive at the conventional-wisdom expense of Gold, (which simplified for you WestPalmBeachers down there means Gold goes down when rates go up). ‘Course, we all know that “Big Oil” et alia are getting the blame; yet inflation was already on the move pre-war, and moreover by the above graphic — assuming that neither do you eat nor drive — the “core” rates themselves are way above the Fed’s targeted +2% shelves.  “Oh Well”–[Fleetwood Mac, ’69].

Too, we’ve the Economic Barometer, for which nine of last week’s 15 incoming metrics improved period-over-period, notably therein Industrial Production for April at +0.7%, its month-over-month swing (from -0.3% in March) the best since that for August 2024.  But March’s Business Inventories backed up quite a bit for a second consecutive month.  Is the moving of product slowing given inflation is growing?  (Do we dare again utter the “s” word?)  Perhaps not just yet as the Baro is still uptrending:

Still, Gold is defying (or at least so trying) its downtrending.  To Gold’s weekly bars we go from a year ago-to-date, the red-dotted parabolic Short trend having now completed a ninth week.  To be sure, this past week’s net loss of -3.8% was price’s worst since that ending 20 March, indeed the third weakest of the 20 weeks year-to-date.  But again, in looking at the rightmost bars, price seems more stable than that through what Silver has suffered.  Still, today at 4544, Gold is -628 points beneath next week’s flip-to-Long level of 5172 as noted.  And although Gold’s expected weekly trading range is still an ample 329 points (the daily being 107 points), price likely again needs at least two firm up weeks to flip the trend from Short back to Long:

Apropos of mentioning Sweet Sister Silver, here too is her like year-over-year graphic.  Silver being far more volatile than Gold, her past week’s net loss of -5.7% comparably ranks sixth-worst so far in 2026, and her parabolic Short trend is now 15 weeks in duration.  Poor ol’ whirlwind Sister Silver!

And so to the 10-day Market Profiles we go for Gold (below left) and Silver (below right). For the yellow metal, clearly 4707 has been the volume-dominant — now resistive — price of the past two weeks … oooh steady on there, biker boy.  For the white metal, let’s face it … ’tis been a couple of bad-hair days.  Temporary as they may be, these have been rather unfriendly trends of late:

Here’s how it all stands for Gold in the stack.

The Gold Stack (continuous contract pricing):

Gold’s All-Time Intra-Day High:  5586 (29 January 2026)
2026’s High:  5586 (29 January)
Gold’s All-Time Closing High:  5411 (28 January 2026)
The Weekly Parabolic Price to flip Long:  5172
10-Session directional range:  up to 4983 (from 4510) = +273 points or +6.1%
Gold’s BEGOS Market Value (from our opening “Scoreboard”):  4769
10-Session “volume-weighted” average price magnet:  4667
Trading Resistance:  Market Profile notables:  4563 / 4621 / 4655 / 4707
Gold Currently:  4544, (expected daily trading range [“EDTR”]:  107 points)
Trading Support:  per the Market Profile:  4533
2026’s Low:  4100 (23 March)
Gold’s Fair Value per Dollar Debasement, (from our opening “Scoreboard”):  4017
The 300-Day Moving Average:  3980 and rising
The 2000’s Triple-Top:  2089 (07 Aug ’20); 2079 (08 Mar’22); 2085 (04 May ’23)
The Gateway to 2000:  1900+
The Final Frontier:  1800-1900
The Northern Front:  1800-1750
On Maneuvers:  1750-1579
The Floor:  1579-1466
Le Sous-sol:  Sub-1466
The Support Shelf:  1454-1434
Base Camp:  1377
The 1360s Double-Top:  1369 in Apr ’18 preceded by 1362 in Sep ’17
Neverland:  The Whiny 1290s
The Box:  1280-1240

Of non-geopolitical interest in the ensuing week is the Wednesday release of the FOMC’s 28/29 April Meeting Minutes.  A bit more hawkish than usual perhaps?  We’ll see who’s been really paying attention to the math.  And Friday brings for April the Conference Board’s Leading (i.e. “lagging”) Indicators, which have not mustered a positive reading since last July, even as the Econ Baro has essentially risen throughout.  ‘Course, ’tis said The Board can go a bit “woke” in its assessments…

Go with the Gold!

Cheers!

…m…

15 May 2026 – 08:44 Central Euro Time

The Dollar’s firm week has it up to its highest level (99.110) since 01 April; thus ’tis no surprise to see the BEGOS Markets (save for Oil) working lower: at present, the Bond, EuroCurrencies, Metals Triumvirate and Spoo are all below today’s Neutral Zones; Oil is above same, and its cac volume is rolling from June into that for July at a -4.20 points discount. Gold’s 21-day linreg remains negative (see Market Trends) and the weekly parabolic Short trend looks to complete its ninth week as we’ll see in tomorrow’s 861st consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. The S&P 500 closed above 7500 yesterday for the first time, the intra-day high (7517) finding the “live” P/E at 49.9x; the yield on the Index is 1.066% vs. 3.588% annualized on the “risk-free” U.S. three-month T-Bill. The Econ Baro finishes its week with May’s NY State Empire Index and April’s IndProd/CapUtil. And there remains one week still to run in Q1 Earnings Season.

14 May 2026 – 08:46 Central Euro Time

Inflation is running sufficiently “hot” such that under just-appointed FedHead Warsh the FOMC “ought” raise rates per its next Policy Statement (17 June); on verra… At present, we’ve Copper as the sole BEGOS Market outside (below) its Neutral Zone for today, and session volatility is again light. The Spoo yesterday moved well-above volume-dominant Market Profile resistance at 7421: its current 7488 price is (in real-time) +516 points above its BEGOS Market Value, such equating the P/E of the S&P 500 to 49.5x, the Index itself yesterday completing a 25th consecutive session as “textbook overbought” whilst posting a record high at 7460. Our best correlation amongst the five primary BEGOS Markets is negative between the Bond and Oil. For the Econ Baro we await metrics including April’s Retail Sales and Ex/Im Prices, plus March’s Business Inventories.

13 May 2026 – 08:37 Central Euro Time

Presently, both the Euro and Oil are below their respective Neutral Zones for today, whist the Spoo is above same; BEGOS Markets’ volatility is light. Over the past couple of years we’ve in The Gold Update said that the Fed need raise rates: that may soon come to pass given the continued ramping up of inflation; (the next FOMC Policy Statement is due 17 June). Looking at Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, our top three (10-test basis) have been Gold’s daily Moneyflow, the non-BEGOS Yen’s 30mn Moneyflow and the Bond’s 1hr MACD; too (on a 24-test basis) they are the Euro’s 30mn Moneyflow, Oil’s 2hr MACD and Silver’s 30mn Parabolics. Silver has been firmly breaking out to the upside, indeed +25% across just the past 11 trading days low-to-high inclusive. And the Econ Baro awaits wholesale inflation for April via the PPI.

12 May 2026 – 08:36 Central Euro Time

Seven of the eight BEGOS Markets are at present in the red, six of which are below today’s Neutral Zones; the lower Bond is within same and Oil is the sole up component at 99.45 and above its Neutral Zone; session volatility is again mostly moderate. The Bond (112^23) yesterday failed to hold Market Profile volume-dominant support at 113^06, and price moved beneath the Market Magnet; by Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, the Bond’s best on a 10-test basis has been its 1hr MACD and on a 24-test basis the 15mn Price Oscillator. For the Precious Metals, at Market Trends Gold’s 21-day linreg still is negative, however that for Silver has rotated to positive, even as price is lower thus far today. April’s CPI and Treasury Budget come due for the Econ Baro.

11 May 2026 – 08:43 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Euro, Swiss Franc and Gold all are at present below today’s Neutral Zones; above same are Copper and Oil, and BEGOS Markets’ volatility is mostly moderate. The Gold Update queries if last week’s rally was one of “relief” given the 21-day linregs for both Gold and Silver remain negative, but less so as the “Baby Blues” of trend consistency are rising (see Market Trends); cited too is our long-ongoing concern of the S&P 500’s extreme overvaluation; by the Spoo’s BEGOS Market Value in real-time, ’tis +532 points above the smooth valuation line and the S&P’s “live” (futs-adj’d) P/E is 48.1x. That stated, substantive money has been getting thrown into the S&P: per our MoneyFlow page, all three time gauges (weekly, monthly and quarterly) suggest the S&P can continue higher still by a few hundred points, (barring this being a “blow-off top”). ‘Tis a busy week for the Econ Baro with 15 incoming metrics scheduled, beginning today with April’s Existing Home Sales.

The Gold Update: No. 860 – (09 May 2026) – “Gold:  Relief Rally or Downtrend Finale? (and S&P Wary)”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 860th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 09 May 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Gold:  Relief Rally or Downtrend Finale? (and S&P Wary)

The lower Gold levels we’d anticipated two weeks ago (price having dropped from our 25 April penning at 4725 by as much as -4.6% to 4510 this past Monday) clearly panned out.  Since that low, Gold has recovered all of such loss and then some, climbing on Thursday to as high as 4775 in settling the week yesterday (Friday) at 4724.  And by the above Scoreboard, the combination of Gold recovering contra to its declining BEGOS Market Value* (now 4748) puts those two levels relatively near one another.  As we oft quip: “Means reversion is a beautiful thAng”.  However (as also therein depicted), given Gold’s Fair Value (now 4011), price remains notably overvalued by +17.8%.
*Gold’s value based on its movement relative to those of BEGOS:  Bond, Euro, Gold, Oil, S&P 500

Still, per our title’s query:  is Gold in just a relief rally, or did the recent downtrend reach its finale?  Let’s have a look.  Et voilà, our latest view, along with that for Silver too, their respective pink 21-day linear regression trends still negatively skewed.  Cue Edith Piaf from ’45: “La Vie en Rose”

‘Course (save for those WestPalmBeachers down there), market participants know ’tis the tendency of technicals to lag price.  And those trendlines for Gold and Silver are losing their downside  consistency because the baby blue dots — at least for the past three trading days — are on the rise.  As these “Baby Blues” tend to lead price, we may see such trends rotate from negative to positive over the next week or two, (the blue dots then having crossed back above their respective 0% axes).

But wait, there’s more:  let’s go to the Market Magnets for both precious metals.  Note the steely upside crossovers of price above Magnet.  As described on the website: “…being ‘attracted’ to and crossing the Magnet, we expect price to continue in the same direction. But when the price gets too far away from the Magnet, we anticipate price to be re-attracted to the Magnet…” Cue Walter Egan with Stevie Nicks from ’78: “Magnet and Steel”

“So, mmb, because they’ve both just crossed, you think there’s more up to come?

‘Tis the rule rather than exception, Squire.  In looking at Gold’s lower-left panel wherein price is labeled as +80 points above the Magnet, the two prior peaks were upwards of +200 points; as for Sister Silver’s lower-right panel at +4.48 points, ’tis about the same distance as seen a month ago; however her February excursion ran toward +10 points higher.

“Ok that’s pretty cool, mmb, but by the weekly stuff, gold’s trend still is down…

Squire, by Gold’s weekly bars and parabolic trends from a year ago-to-date, price just completed its eighth Short week per the rightmost red dots.  But the good news is that through these last six weeks, Gold has been more contained, indeed trending sideways as opposed to downward:

Sideways notwithstanding, for Gold in the ensuing week to flip its parabolic trend from Short to Long, price need rise +493 points such as to eclipse the noted 5217 level.  As of now, the expected weekly trading range is “only” 335 points, (last’s week’s actual range being “just” 265 points), and the daily 107 points.  Thus barring the long-bankrupt U.S. Treasury actually acknowleding bankruptcy (or some other momentous market-moving event), Gold’s Short trend likely has more than a week before reaching its end, even should price continue to ascend.

Meanwhile:  shall there ever be an end to the meteoric rise in the S&P 500?  Our wariness is beyond extreme.  ‘Round here, the high-level finance folks with whom we’re humbly honoured to engage all ‘know’ that “The Crash!” is coming.  (‘Tis been re-hashed time and again now for some three years).  Regardless, recall in our 18 April missive that for the S&P’s practically non-existent dividend yield to match that of the annualized three-month U.S. T-Bill, the Index need decline -64%.  (That won’t be on CNBS).  And perhaps such demise is near, for as a fine friend the other day said:  “It’s different now.”  That thus stated, we’ve repetitively learned that ’tis never different.

To be sure, the S&P’s Q1 Earnings Season has exhibited excellent year-over-year growth; but as we’ve regularly underscored, the actual level of earnings remains too poor to maintain price, especially given more than triple the yield in the “risk-free” T-Bill.

So, here’s the quintessential question to pose for equities chasers in this Investing Age of Stoopid.  The price of an investment into which you want to pile on along with all the lemmings is $48.20.  Your trusty stockbroker tells you that if you buy today at that price, one year from now your value will be — including dividend yield — $49.72.  Gonna buy it?  Of course not. A +3.15% gain is boring!   No.  You want stocks that triple several times a year, ’cause that’s what everybody else has.

“Well, what exactly is that $48.20 stock, mmb?

‘Tis not a stock, Squire. Rather, ’tis proportionally the “price” and “return” of the S&P 500 today.  The price/earnings ratio settled this past week at 48.20x.  That means you are willing to pay $48.20 for something that in a year shall earn $1.00, putting the price (per retained earnings) at $49.20.  Add in the amazing yield of 1.080% for another 52¢ and there’s your all-in value a year hence of $49.72 … just in case you’re scoring at home.

Looking to gain even less?  By the same proportional math for some specific S&P constituents, buying Tesla (TSLA) equates to paying $358 for something that earns $1.  CoStar Group (CSGP)?  $536 to gain $1.  Or “How much is that doggie in the window?”–[Patti Page, ’53] Datadog (DDOG) $647 to earn $1.  Then of course, one can do a full face-plant with CrowdStrike Holdings (CRDW) by paying an actual $528 for something that earns nothing.  Have a great day.  The Economic Barometer continues to have its share of them…

 

…albeit this past week was a bit of a mixed bag.  18 metrics came into the Baro, of which eight bettered the prior period, eight were worse, and two remained the same.  March’s Factory Orders were the best of the bunch in beating both consensus and February, even as that month was revised higher.  America is making stuff!  Well sort of:  the worst metric of the week was the first peek at Productivity for Q1, which missed consensus, was less than that for Q4, itself revised lower.  Thus more “stuff” is being made less efficiently.

Wealth efficiency, however, is promoted by precious metals.  And as to their respective “Nows”, next we’ve the 10-day Market Profiles for Gold at left and for Silver at right.  This past week’s rallies moved prices up though resistance morphing such into support.  For the yellow metal, down to 4691 looks safe, whereas for the white metal, shall the 80s hold?  Let’s see how her new week from 80.84 unfolds:

We’ll wrap it here with this updated image from “A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words Dept.”, or in this case, perhaps just one word:  “YIKES!”

Here’s a better word:  GOLD!”

Cheers!

…m…

08 May 2026 – 08:48 Central Euro Time

The EuroCurrencises, Metals Triumvirate and Spoo are all presently above today’s Neutral Zones; below same is Oil, and session volatility for the BEGOS Markets runs from mild for the Bond to robust for Copper, the latter having thus far traced 169% of its EDTR (see Market Ranges). Copper’s best Market Rhythm for pure swing consistency is (on a 10-test basis) the 30mn Moneyflow and (on a 24-test basis) the daily MACD; too, the daily MACD in swinging has reached at least 0.10 targeted (in hindsight) points across the last 10 swings in-a-row. Gold (4740) has moved well-up from its Monday low of 4510: more on the precious metals in tomorrow’s 860th consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. Today the Econ Baro awaits April’s Payrolls data, May’s UoM Sentiment Survey, and March’s Wholesale Inventories.

07 May 2026 – 08:46 Central Euro Time

Record highs continue for the S&P 500, yesterday achieving 7369: the futs-adj’d “live” P/E at this moment is 46.7x and the yield is down to 1.076%. Presently, both Gold and Silver are above today’s Neutral Zones; otherwise, the rest of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and volatility is light. By Market Trends, we’ve positive 21-day linregs for the Swiss Franc, Copper, Oil and the Spoo; thus they are negative for the Bond, Euro, Gold and Silver. Oil yesterday settled below its Market Magnet for the first time since 20 April as well as below its smooth valuation line for the first time since 27 April, both suggestive of still lower prices near-term; Oil’s best Market Rhythm for pure swing consistency is its 30mn Moneyflow. The Econ Baro’s incoming metrics include March’s Consumer Credit and Construction Spending, plus the latter’s (delayed) for February, and the initial read of Q1’s Productivity and Unit Labor Costs.

06 May 2026 – 08:43 Central Euro Time

‘Tis a moderate-to-robust volatile start to Wednesday with seven of the eight BEGOS Markets at present above their day’s respective Neutral Zones, the sole component below being Oil. Gold is up better than +100 points, however by Market Trends the “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency are still falling, as are those for Silver; since The Gold Update’s (25 April) anticipation for lower Gold prices, the yellow metal has dropped by as much as -4.6%, notwithstanding this second session of “relief rally”; currently 4677, Gold’s most volume-dominant overhead resistor is 4725 (see Market Profiles). The S&P 500 continues to make record highs (7273) even as the Index is now 19 consecutive trading days “textbook overbought”: by Market Values in real-time, the Spoo is +505 points “high” above its smooth valuation line. For the Econ Baro we’ve April’s ADP Employment data.

05 May 2026 – 10:11 Central Euro Time

A bit tardy this morning given an internet “slowdown”. For the moment, we’ve all three elements of the Metals Triumvirate above today’s Neutral Zones, as is the Spoo. The other BEGOS Markets are within same, and volatility is light-to-moderate. The precious metals’ recovery thus far today is not enough to stem the “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency from further falling in real-time, (see Market Trends). As to our best Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, the 10-test leaders have been Gold’s daily Moneyflow, the Euro’s 30mn Moneyflow and Copper’s 8hr Moneyflow; for the 24-test basis they are Silver’s 15mn for both its Moneyflow and MACD, plus the Bond’s 1hr Moneyflow. The Econ Baro awaits April’s ISM(Svc) Index, March’s Trade Deficit and New Home Sales, plus the latter (delayed) for February.

04 May 2026 – 08:35 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Gold and Oil are all at present below today’s Neutral Zones; above same are the Euro and Spoo, and session volatility for the BEGOS Markets is mostly moderate. The Gold Update takes a mildly cautious stance on the precious metals, both of which though Friday are up +6.8% year-to-date, having of course been substantially higher in late January; at Market Trends, Gold’s “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency continue to drop, whereas those for Silver are momentarily hesitant; by Market Values, Gold is (in real-time) -158 points below its smooth valuation line; too by the deMeadville EMAs, the 21-day has crossed beneath the 89-day, plus the daily Parabolics, MACD, Price Oscillator and Moneyflow are all negatively positioned. The Spoo for the moment would elicit a higher open later today for the S&P 500. And ’tis a busy week for the Econ Baro beginning with March’s Factory Orders.

The Gold Update: No. 859 – (02 May 2026) – “Gold’s Year-to-Date Gain Nearly Gone”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 859th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 02 May 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Gold’s Year-to-Date Gain Nearly Gone

‘Course, Gold’s year-to-date gain was already gone back on 23 March, only to have in part recovered.  But:  bang on cue following last week’s piece “Likely Lower Levels for the Precious Metals“, both Gold and Silver began this past week with three consecutive losing days.  Into Wednesday’s lows, the yellow metal’s week had declined by as much as -4.3% and that for the white metal by as much as -6.3%.

Fortunately, the balance of the week mitigated much if not all of the selling, Gold settling yesterday (Friday) at 4626, “just” -2.1% net for the week, and Silver at 75.84 for a week’s net wee gain of +0.2%.  However, might technical pullback further ensue?  This calls for further review as herein we’ll do.

Either way, as we commence the year’s second quadrimestre, the precious metals are — after “Big Oil” — still on the balance of the podium, both now up a like amount to each other per our year-to-date BEGOS Markets Standings.  This in spite of come 23 March, as noted Gold had given up the entirety of the year’s gain from 5586 to 4100, a nearly -27% drop at which point price for 2026 was down more than -5%.  Yet that was then, this is now:

‘Course, ’tis fair to say that both precious metals have given back the lion’s share of their year-to-date gains:  come 29 January, Gold was +28.9% and Silver (deep breath) +71.6%.  But by their respective opening Scoreboard Fair Values (Gold’s being 4005 vs. present price of 4626 and Silver’s being 57.81 vs. present price of 75.84), such excessive overvaluation has been unwinding.  Below, specific to Gold by its weekly bars from one year ago-to-date, the red-dotted Short trend has just completed its seventh week, (price having started such stint from 5010):

And per usual as ’tis month-end (plus one trading day in May), we’ve our “Live by the Leverage, Die by the Leverage” year-over-year chart of Gold’s percentage track vis-à-vis those of key metals equities.  Thus from most-to-least we’ve the Global X Silver Miners exchange-traded fund (SIL) +118%, both Newmont (NEM) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) +106%, the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners exchange-traded fund (GDX) +78%, Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) +56%, Gold itself +40%, and Franco-Nevada (FNV) +32%.  (And those “lower right shoulders” are not looking very promising…).  So:  is Gold en route back to Fair Value (4005)?  The trend is one’s — er uh — friend…

Too, trading range compression has continued.  Gold’s trading range this past week was 224 points, second-narrowest of the last nine, as the EDTRs (“Expected Daily Trading Ranges”) for both precious metals have become slimmer still per the next graphic, (for which we remind you WestPalmBeachers down there this is not price direction; rather ’tis expectation of daily price range):

As thereon depicted in the two boxes, Gold’s EDTR going into Monday is now 104 points, only 37% of the expectation for 283 points back its peak on 09 February, and that for Silver is now 3.36 points, just 25% of the 13.46 sought for that same date.  As to achieving/exceeding the EDTRs, across the past 28 trading days, Gold has only so done six times and Silver seven.  Also notable is a reduction in trading activity:  Gold’s average daily contract volume in April was but a scant 65% of that for March, and for Silver ’twas 76%.  Cue Pink Floyd’s: “The Narrow Way” –[’69].   

Thus for the precious metals we’ve narrowing trading ranges and reductions in volume.  Querymight the Fed have the metals spooked, indeed waiting for what (by the math) we deem as inevitably higher FedFunds interest rates?  This past week, the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee again voted to maintain its current 3.50%-3.75% targeted rate range as it has since last 10 December (through three subsequent meetings).  As is universally recognized, the Fed seeks disinflation of inflation back down to 2%.  But per the completed Inflation Summary Table for March, we’re still going the wrong way, the underscored two averages back in February having been respectively 2.9% and 5.0%.  Now look at them:

“And the metals don’t like Fed rate hikes, right mmb?

As a rule of thumb, Squire, that is generally true, or certainly so is the conventional wisdom, (even as both Gold and FedFunds rates rose together from 2004-2006).  Either way, there are 32 trading sessions between now and the next FOMC Policy Statement (17 June), and a lot can happen en route.  Do mind the website’s “Gold” and “Silver” pages, (especially if you’re scoring at home).

Indeed whilst minding this somewhat cautionary state of Gold, to look at the StateSide economy and S&P 500, everything’s right with the world!  The Economic Barometer staged a week of recovery, with 10 of the 16 incoming metrics bettering their period-over-period results, notably so The Conference Board’s April reading of Consumer Confidence, plus March’s Personal Income, Spending, Durable Orders and Housing Starts, whilst the S&P continued to make record highs.

“But, mmb, there’s something not right about that…

Squire, as said Alice, “curiouser and curiouser”.  ‘Tis exclaimed through the FinMedia that this ongoing Q1 Earnings Season is “spectacular!”  ‘Course, that depends on how one looks at it.  To be sure, of the 297 S&P 500 constituents having thus far reported, 79% have upped their bottom lines from Q1 a year ago, a solid above-average pace of improvement.  But because the S&P itself keeps rising, the price/earnings ratio (now 49.2x per the opening Scoreboard) remains far above ultimate acceptability, there being practically no yield left in the Index (1.101%) as opposed to the “risk-free” three-month annualized U.S. T-Bill (3.575%).  But as we’ve on occasion quipped, saying at the cocktail party that you invest in treasuries instead of stocks isn’t very sexy; rather ’tis boring:  “Yeah?  We’ll I own Nvidia, man, ’cause I’m like sooo smart!”  Good for you, “man”.  (Let’s see how that 40.2x NVDA yieldless P/E works out for ya).  Here’s the Baro (blue line) from a year ago-to-date along with the sky-high S&P:

Again, it being month-end, ’tis time to go ’round the horn for all eight BEGOS Markets by their last 21 trading days (one month) including each component’s grey regression trendline and our famous “Baby Blues”, the dots which depict the day-to-day consistency of the trendlines.  Such trend for Gold clearly is negative, whereas for Silver ’tis momentarily flat.  Obviously that for the S&P 500 (“SPOO”) is in steep ascendence, albeit upon its “Blues” breaking below the +80% level, the next “sell” shall be underway:

Now we’ve the 10-day Market Profiles for Gold on the left and for Silver on the right.  The yellow metal is currently nestled in the lower third of its Profile, basically in the 4650-4500 range.  As for the white metal, her nearby range spans from 77.35 down to 73.65, the labels for both metals being the levels with the highest trading volumes in those price areas:

And here we’ve the Gold Structure by the month since the year 2020, (again featuring the Pink Floyd piece as afore-referenced).  The right-most “candle” is only the first day for May; however the preceding April candle clearly shows the trading range as having compressed.  Yes, David, ’tis narrowed a bit up there:

Thus in further review, Gold has given back most of what had been a substantive gain by 29 January of 5586 (+28.9%) to now a vastly reduced +6.8%, albeit having since nicely recovered from March’s 4100 low.  To wit, this day-to-day graphic of Gold’s percentage ride since the 4332 (black line) close in 2025, the “lower highs” of both 02 March and 17 April giving at least technical cause for concern:

However, we do not take fundamental pause.  Yes, Gold is currently +15.5% above the Gold Scoreboard’s Fair Value of 4005, and could well revisit that level.  But hardly shall we allow debasing currency us dishevel!

Cheers!

…m…

 

01 May 2026 – 08:44 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Swiss Franc, Gold and Copper all at present are below their respective Neutral Zones for today; above same is Oil, and BEGOS Markets’ volatility is light. As anticipated, Silver’s linreg (see Market Trends) has joined Gold in rotating from positive to negative; more on the metals’ expectedly down week in tomorrow’s 859th consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. Going ’round the the Market Values horn in real-time for the five primary BEGOS components: we’ve the Bond -2^16 points “low” beneath its smooth valuation line, the Euro -.005 points “low”, Gold -166 points “low”, Oil +7.09 points “high” and the Spoo +475 points “high”, the S&P itself now 16 trading days “textbook overbought”. Were StateSide equities to open at this instant, they’d be a bit higher, and we expect there’ll be much near-term FinMedia babble regaining “Dow 50k”, (as it first briefly had in February), barring it all going wrong. The Econ Baro completes its busy week with April’s ISM(Mfg) Index.

30 April 2026 – 08:41 Central Euro Time

Following three straight days of decline, both precious metals are presently above today’s Neutral Zones, as is Oil; the balance of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and session volatility is moderate. By Market Trends as suggested yesterday, Gold’s linreg has (in real-time) rotated to negative, whilst that for Silver looks to so do by tomorrow despite both metals being up today. Looking at Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, our Top Three by the 10-test basis are Gold’s daily Moneyflow, Copper’s 8hr Parabolics, and again Gold’s 30mn MACD, whereas per a 24-test basis we’ve Copper’s 30mn Parabolics, the Swiss Franc’s 1hr MACD, and the Spoo’s 1hr Parabolics. Nine metrics come due today for the Econ Baro, including April’s Chi PMI, March’s Personal Income/Spending,“Fed-Favoured” PCE data and Leading Indicators, plus the first peek at Q1 GDP and the Employment Cost Index.

29 April 2026 – 08:44 Central Euro Time

Presently, the Euro is below its Neutral Zone for today, whilst above same are both Copper and Oil; BEGOS Markets’ volatility is light. As we’d already seen for Silver, Gold too yesterday traded down into the “Golden Ratio” retracement zone as noted in The Gold Update: Gold’s low thus far in the week is 4568 whilst that for Silver is 71.93; ‘twould appear by week’s end, both precious metals linregs shall have rotated from positive to negative (see Market Trends); as well, Copper’s “Baby Blues” of trend consistency confirmed dropping below the +80% axis, indicative of lower prices near-term. The S&P 500 is now 14 consecutive trading sessions as “textbook overbought”; and the Spoo by its Market Value is (in real-time) +427 points above its smooth valuation line. There are varying sources for today’s incoming Econ Baro metrics: to be sure, we’ll get March’s Durable Orders, and maybe a combination of February and March data for Housing Starts/Permits, plus perhaps same for New Home Sales, albeit they also are scheduled for next week … on verra… Then at 18:00 GMT comes the FOMC’s “no change” Policy Statement.

28 April 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

The Euro, Swiss Franc, and all three elements of the Metals Triumvirate are presently below their respective Neutral Zones for today; above same is Oil, and session volatility for the BEGOS Markets is moderate, noting therein that Silver already has traced 101% of today’s EDTR (see Market Ranges). Too, Silver’s cac volume is rolling from May into that for July. At Market Trends, the “Baby Blues” of regression trend consistency continue to fall for the precious metals; indeed Silver has today reached down into the “Golden Ratio” retracement range as cited in the current edition of The Gold Update; as well, both Gold and Silver are now trading below the bottom of their 10-day Market Profiles. The S&P 500 has again recorded closing (7174) and intra-day (7179) highs, and is now 13 consecutive trading days “textbook overbought”; the “live” (futs-adj’d) P/E is 48.8x. The Econ Baro awaits Consumer Confidence for April.

27 April 2026 – 08:40 Central Euro Time

Early on we’ve the Bond at present below its Neutral Zone for today, whilst above same is Oil; volatility for the BEGOS Markets is light-to-moderate. The Gold Update points to last week’s decline in the “Baby Blues” of regression trend consistency for both precious metals such that lower price levels are likely in the near-term offing. The S&P 500 concluded Friday at an all-time closing high of 7165, the intra-day high having been a record 7169; by the Spoo, today’s S&P opening ought be mildly lower; per the Spoo’s 10-day Market Profile, price (currently 7188) has its most volume-dominant Profile support at 7162. Copper’s cac volume is rolling from May into that for July. And whilst nothing is due today for the Econ Baro, ’tis a busy week with 14 scheduled metrics, plus the “no change” FOMC Policy Statement on Wednesday.

The Gold Update: No. 858 – (25 April 2026) – “Likely Lower Levels for the Precious Metals”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 858th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 25 April 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Likely Lower Levels for the Precious Metals

  • This past Wednesday, our deMeadville analytics produced a near-term “sell signal” for Gold.
  • This past Thursday, our deMeadville analytics produced a near-term “sell signal” for Silver.

“And heeeere they arrrrrre!” –[Monty Hall, “Let’s Make a Deal”, 1963-1991]

Ahh, the breaking down of the ‘Baby Blues’, right mmb?”

Exactly so, Squire.  The baby blue dots of 21-day linear regression trend consistency have been a favoured leading indicator of deMeadville for many years.  (As a valued reader wrote to us better than a decade ago:  “Let me not forget to tip my hat to the Baby Blues – they have made my trading far more successful and less stressful!”)

And specific to the above case for both Gold on the left and for Silver on the right, their respective “Baby Blues” have fallen through the key +80% axis per the red-encircled dots, the rule there being likely lower levels near-term.

To wit, the fine team from our “There’s No Holy Grail Dept.” assembled this table of “Baby Blues” sell signals for both Gold (four) and Silver (five) from a year ago-to-date, even as we hasten to state that “Shorting Gold is a bad idea.”  The maximum points and monetary losses/contract within the ensuing 21 trading days (one month) are therein compiled, the two new fresh signals with “???”:

Thus, as an appropriate musical ditty: “Where Do We Go From Here?” –[Chicago, ’70]

‘Course, ’tis unknown as to how low the precious metals shall go, if at all.  And by price structure, we don’t see anything helpfully tangible.  So we went instead to ol’ Leonardo “Fibonacci” Bonacci to find some reasonable expectation for the downside. And here’s what “The Fibster” found:

  • For Gold (June contract):  it settled yesterday (Friday) at 4725.  The dominant recent low was 4129 (22 March) and dominant high 4918 (17 April).  Thus the Golden Ratio retracement range spans from 4616 (-38.2%) down to 4430 (-61.8%).

  • For Silver (May contract):  it settled yesterday (Friday) at 75.69.  The dominant recent low was 61.21 (likewise on 22 March) and dominant high 83.25 (likewise on 17 April).  Thus the Golden Ratio retracement range spans from 74.21 (-38.2%) down to 69.63 (-61.8%).

All that, just in case you’re scoring at home.  Preferably however, Gold and Silver simply resume higher.  Yet, ad nauseam we repeat:  “Follow the Blues instead of the news, else lose yer shoes.”

Either way, to be sure, Gold and “Big Oil” have been in a war phase of negative correlation.  Restrain the transit of Oil and the price rises.  In turn, the demand for Dollars with which to purchase Oil also rises.  And whilst we’ve on occasion demonstrated over the years that “Gold plays no currency favourites”, in these warring times, the knee-jerk reaction is to sell Gold given the oxymoronic condition known as “Dollar strength”, which on balance (albeit not very consistently) been the case since the USA/IRN war commenced on 28 February.  Indeed in the past week alone, the Buck made “higher daily highs” each of Monday through Thursday, although the “war-high” Dollar Index level of 100.500 remains above the current 98.340 level.

But the point is:  rising Oil has led to declining Gold as we look at their BEGOS Markets (Bond / Euro / Gold / Oil / S&P 500) correlation through these first 78 trading days of 2026.  Note the red square marking the war’s commencement, (Gold then 5296 vs. 4725 today, i.e. -10.8%).  Beneath the red axis indicates negative correlation:

In turning to Gold’s weekly bars from a year ago-to-date, this past week’s span of 183 points was the narrowest since that ending 14 weeks back on 16 January, even as the expected weekly trading range remains rather robust at 349 points, (and the daily 112 points).  Too, contract volume in April is comparably subdued to that traded in March.  Thus as we saw by the “Baby Blues” falling off, Gold may be seeking a rest, especially given how otherwise volatile this year’s first quadrimester has been:

As to the 10-day Market Profiles of Gold (below left) and of Silver (below right), what we’d cited a week ago as support areas for Gold “…the yellow metal by the 4800s…” and for Silver “…the white metal basically by the 79 handle…” obviously have morphed into resistance:

“Well, mmb, if support and resistance always held, the markets wouldn’t go anywhere…

That, dear Squire, elicits the foundational cornerstone of what today is the oft-ignored essential of “cash management”, (which for you WestPalmBeachers down there means knowing precisely where you’ll exit your losing trade before even placing it).  And by the white present-level bar in both of the two volume-weighted stacks, Gold by price is -3.7% from the top of its Profile, and Sister Silver -9.0%:

But then there’s the “Nuthin’ But Up Dept.” known as the S&P 500, (or as we on occasion more accurately refer to it, the “Casino 500”).  “War?  What war??”  Warring in the 21st century has been StateSide stocks friendly:  now 39 trading days into Iran, the S&P is at a record closing high (7165) +4.2%.  Remember Syria in 2014?  39 trading days in ’twas +1.4%.  How ’bout Libya in 2011:  +4.6% for the same stint.  And respectively for Iraq in 2003 +8.8% and for Afghanistan in 2001 +6.4%, both after 39 trading days.

Today the S&P 500 is now 12 consecutive trading days “textbook overbought”, the “live” price/earnings ratio is 48.5x and the yield (jeepers, ’tis so tiny we can’t find it…) oh there ’tis:  1.109%.  Astride the Economic Barometer, which — save for improved Retail Sales in March — basically put in an uneventful week, is the never war-weary S&P red line:

Toward closing, on a nightly basis for the website we run 405 Market Rhythm studies across all of the BEGOS Markets.  And whilst nothing works in perpetuity for any market study, that which has been best for Gold through its last 10 swings is the four-hour Price Oscillator, (which is a “canned” study supplied by high-level data providers).  In running this particular study through the deMeadville number-crunching, we found it to have reached an in hindsight profit objective of at least 56 points 10-times in-a-row, (from 05 February-to-date with an average duration per swing of five calendar days).  At $100/point/contract, here’s that in hindsight profit picture:

Again we emphasize the above results are in hindsight.

“Yeah, but still, mmb, ten times back-to-back is amazing!

Squire, this is where — again — cash management is of critical concern.  You may recall the French Revolution survivor Pierre-Simon, Marquis de Laplace.  Per his infamous “Rule of Succession”, in this case for something having occurred ten consecutive times, the probability of an eleventh like occurrence is mathematically 91.67%.  HOWEVER (emphasized), in the reality of trading, the actual probability is 50.00%.  Period.  Do try not to get carried away.

But should precious metals near-term slip away, ‘tis good to still have Gold along the way!

Cheers!

…m…

24 April 2026 – 08:40 Central Euro Time

Into week’s end we’ve at present Gold, Silver and Oil below today’s Neutral Zones; the other five BEGOS Markets are within same, and volatility for the session is light. Following (per yesterday’s comment) Gold having confirmed on Wednesday the “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency having moved below their key +80% axis, price since has dropped to as low as 4672; too, Silver’s “Baby Blues” yesterday confirmed moving below their +80% axis; more of course in tomorrow’s 858th consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. The S&P 500 made a marginal record intraday high yesterday to (precisely) 7147.78, (the prior such high being on 17 April at 7147.52); the Index is now 11 consecutive days “textbook overbought”. The Econ Baro concludes its quiet week with the revision to April’s UofM Sentiment Survey.

23 April 2026 – 08:48 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Gold, Silver, Copper and the Spoo are all presently below today’s Neutral Zones; only Oil is above same, and BEGOS Markets’ volatility is mostly moderate, noting that Copper already has traced 103% of today’s EDTR (see Market ranges). By Market Trends, ironically Oil is the sole BEGOS component in negative linreg, as today at 94.23 price is well-down from 117.63 peak of three weeks ago. Thus Gold’s linreg is positive, however, its “Baby Blues” of trend consistency confirmed settling below the key +80% level yesterday such that still lower prices “ought be” in the near-term offing. Currently 4733, the mid-4600s would seem a reasonable destination, below which there is trading congestion through 4600-4400 zone; for pure swing consistency, Gold’s best Market Rhythms have been the daily Moneyflow (10-test basis) and the 15mn Moneyflow (24-test basis). For the Econ Baro we’ve just the usual Initial Jobless Claims from the prior week.

22 April 2026 – 08:42 Central Euro Time

All three elements of the Metals Triumvirate are at present above their respective Neutral Zones for today, whilst below same is Oil; volatility for the BEGOS Markets is mostly light, the largest EDTR tracing to this point being Oil at 49% (see Market Ranges). Oil’s best Market Rhythm for pure swing consistency on a 10-test basis is the 1hr MACD, whilst on a 24-test basis ’tis the 15mn Parabolics; Oil’s 21-day linreg trend is slightly becoming more negative as the “Baby Blues” of trend consistency have fallen below the 0% axis (see Market Trends); and by its Market Profile, Oil (currently 88.77) is trading below its most volume-dominant price for the past fortnight of 89.70. Nothing is due today for the Econ Baro. And Q1 Earnings season for the S&P 500 continues to run at an above-average pace: with 53 constituents thus far having reported, 44 (83%) have improved their quarterly year-over-year bottom lines; at issue, however, remains the dangerously high (futs-adj’d) P/E of 48.2x.

21 April 2026 – 08:44 Central Euro Time

Presently we’ve both precious metals below today’s Neutral Zones; otherwise, the balance of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and volatility is light. From an intra-day standpoint since the past week or two, the markets can best be characterized as “messy”. Regardless, let’s go ’round the horn (in real-time) for the Market Values of the five primary BEGOS components: the Bond is just -0^10 points “low” beneath its smooth valuation line, the Euro 0.013 points “high”, Gold -63 points “low”, Oil -6.16 points “low” (having reverted all the way back to its BEGOS valuation after having been some +34 points “high” at the beginning of April), and the Spoo +457 points “high”, the S&P 500 having completed a fifth consecutive session as extremely “textbook overbought”; too, by our MoneyFlow page (quarterly basis), the S&P “ought be” -597 points lower than ’tis. The Econ Baro looks to March’s Retail Sales and Pending Home Sales, plus Business Inventories for February.

20 April 2026 – 08:46 Central Euro Time

With events in the Middle East taking a negative turn, the BEGOS Markets today featured various “gap” openings, notably Oil which settled Friday at 85.57 opened up at 88.15, Gold from 4849 down to open at 4812 and the Spoo from 7164 down to open at 7103. At present, the Bond, Gold, Silver and Spoo are below today’s Neutral Zones, whilst Oil is above same, and session volatility is mostly moderate. The Gold Update points to price having nearly reverted back up to its BEGOS Market Value, whereas the S&P 500 having set a record high on Friday remains vastly overvalued by earnings (fundamental) as well as extremely “textbook overbought” (technical). Nothing is due today for the Econ Baro with a very light load in the week’s balance of just six incoming metrics. However, Q1 Earnings Seasons really starts to ramp up as its third week gets underway.

The Gold Update: No. 857 – (18 April 2026) – “Gold’s Means Reversion; S&P’s Record Excursion”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 857th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 18 April 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Gold’s Means Reversion; S&P’s Record Excursion

Our recent missives have underscored Gold’s volatility as having been reduced from vehement to narrow.  Here at deMeadville, we are keen watchers of one of the most overlooked metrics in trading:  range, notably that which is expected for each ensuing trading day, regardless of direction.  ‘Tis why on the website we’ve the Market Ranges page which embodies the year-over-year “EDTR” (“Expected Daily Trading Range”) for each of the eight BEGOS Markets (Bond, Euro/Swiss Franc, Gold/Silver/Copper, Oil, S&P 500).

Knowing the EDTR — be it for any of the BEGOS Markets or even equites — helps to keep one’s feet on the ground.  For example, how many times across the S&P 500’s post-COVID six-year rally have we heard some yahoo boastfully exclaim:  “Oh!  I just bought XXX ’cause after earnings today it’s gonna fly” … only to find some days later that it never got very far off the tarmac.  (You ought have had a sense of expected range there, Bunky).

Either way, with Gold having settled its week yesterday (Friday) at 4849, the compressing of range continues.  The following graphic is our year-to-date view of Gold’s actual daily trading ranges (the bars) vis-à-vis each day’s EDTR (the line). Clearly during April, daily range has been narrowing.  In fact, specific to the past 10 trading days’ ranges, none have reached up to the EDTR, even as ’tis been contracting:

Moreover, in each trading day’s Prescient Commentary we cite the stance of the BEGOS Markets relative to their “Neutral Zones”:  be a market higher or lower, if its price is within that day’s Neutral Zone, we deem the day as essentially “unchanged”.  And across Gold’s past 10 trading days, five have concluded within the Neutral Zone.

“It’s kinda like that Chris Isaac song, right mmb?

Squire is referring to the ’95 tune about the girl with dirty blonde hair wearing a taupe miniskirt whilst standing with her overnight case in the Greyhound bus station: “Goin’ Nowhere”.

Not that Gold’s hasn’t gone anywhere.  Price year-to-date has spanned from 5586 (our forecast high 5546) down to 4100 (our forecast low 4136), a range of -1486 points (-26.6%).  ‘Course, with 179 trading days remaining in 2026, ’tis far too soon to “take credit” that we “nailed it”.  But range has been nonetheless narrowing.  Both of the past two weeks have recorded notably narrower trading ranges (262 and 292 points chronologically) than those of the three prior (571, 501 and 413 chronologically).  So to Gold’s weekly bars we go, the red-dotted parabolic Short trend having completed its fifth week, such stance having commenced back on 16 March when priced opened at 5010:

Meanwhile from the “Means Reversion Dept.” we’ve this updated graphic of Gold from a year ago-to-date along with its smooth valuation line born of price’s movement relative to those of the five primary BEGOS Markets as therein noted.  To reprise, ’twasn’t that far back on 26 March (only 15 trading days ago) that Gold settled at a record -886 points (-16.8%) beneath valuation.  Now as we below see, ’tis just -55 points “low”.  As we oft quip, “Means reversion is a beautiful thAng” … (however, when it finally hits the S&P 500, ’twill be horrifying, perhaps per our wrap).  Here’s the Gold graphic with price nearly having reverted back up to valuation, (which is a swifter valuing of Gold than is Fair Value by which Gold remains quite high):

Now we just made reference to the S&P 500, the mighty Index overvalued, overbought and overhyped beyond belief.

“Well, mmb, they say the war is winding down…

Squire, it puts us in mind of the old saying “There’s been a sudden breakout of peace”, albeit so called “cease fires” carry a rather temporary tone.  And now we’ve just learned the Straits of Hormuz have again been “closed”.

Regardless, ’twas but seven missives ago on 28 February that we penned “… in setting this morning to write our 850th consecutive Saturday missive, we’ve just learned of the commencement of USA/ISR attacks on IRN…”  The S&P then was 6879, Oil 67.29 and Gold 5296.  Today, Gold is -8% lower at 4849, Oil +27% higher at 85.57 (and at one point was +75% higher at 117.63) and the S&P now +4% higher at the record closing high of 7126.  Were not higher energy prices to wreak havoc on corporate earnings?

To be sure, only the single war month of March is included in this Q1 Earnings Season, which whilst still quite young for the S&P 500 has thus far been excellent:  30 constituents have reported, of which 25 — that’s 83% — have bettered their bottom lines over Q1 of a year ago.  Going as far back as 2017, the average quarterly year-over-year improvement is 66%. “Happy Days Are Here Again”  –[Ager/Yellen, ’29].  However, problematic as we’ve time and again mentioned is that the nominal level of earnings need really to double toward supporting the stratospherically high level of the S&P; the median increase thus in Q1 earnings Season far is “only” +20% — which actually is great — but ’tis not the +100% “requisite” to get earnings in line with price.

Yet, so happy are the S&Pers that they’ve driven up the Index to now being (by our technical cocktail of Relative Strength, Stochastics and John Bollinger’s Bands) extremely “textbook overbought”, the price/earnings ratio a laughable 48.7x, with a pitifully puny yield of 1.127%, whereas noted in the opening Gold Scoreboard, the three-month annualized U.S. T-Bill yield is 3.600%.  Again, that’s more than triple the S&P’s dividend return and you shan’t lose your money … at least not until the U.S. Treasury defaults and/or the Buck gets nixed as the world ‘s reserve currency.  For you WestPalmBeachers down there, that is why you want to own Gold.

Meanwhile, to the suddenly sagging Econ Baro we go, ignored ‘natch by an S&P all aglow, the high P/Es list pulled from the website you know:

Indeed of the past week’s 11 incoming Economic Barometer metrics, just four improved period-over-period, notably therein both the New York State Empire and Philly Fed Indices for April.  But March’s Producer Price Index (barring neither you eat nor drive) was again quite inflationary, the +0.5% pace annualized at +6.0% being ever so far afield from the Federal Reserve’s +2.0% target.  Why, even FedGov Stephen “The Mirage” Miran on Thursday reduced his rate cuts projection for this year from four to perhaps three, inflation having become (hat-tip Barron’s) “more complicated even before war with Iran began”.  Yo, Mirage Man:  instead, how ’bout a rate increase or two, hmmm?

And speaking of increases, even as trading ranges narrow, our baby blue dots of regression trend consistency have been well on the rise for the precious metals as we below see for Gold on the left and for Silver on the right by the day across the past three months.  Recall “Follow the Blues instead of the news, else lose yer shoes…”?  Indeed you do:

Too, we’ve the 10-day Market Profiles for Gold (below left) and for Silver (below right).  Price is supportively-positioned in both cases, the yellow metal by the 4800s and the white metal basically by the 79 handle, her having just settled a completed week above 80 (at 80.93) for the first time since that ending 13 March.  Cautiously however by the Scoreboard, whereas Gold is presently +23.2% above Fair Value (3937), Silver is +42.4% above same (56.82).  Hang in there, Sister Silver…

Toward our wrap, here’s the stack:

The Gold Stack (continuous contract pricing):
Gold’s All-Time Intra-Day High:  5586 (29 January 2026)
2026’s High:  5586 (29 January)
Gold’s All-Time Closing High:  5411 (28 January 2026)
The Weekly Parabolic Price to flip Long:  5362
10-Session directional range:  up to 4908 (from 4628) = +280 points or +6.1%
Gold’s BEGOS Market Value (from our opening “Scoreboard”):  4905
Trading Resistance:  vis-à-vis the Market Profile, 4880 – 4910
Gold Currently:  4849, (expected daily trading range [“EDTR”]:  135 points)
Trading Support:  vis-à-vis the Market Profile, the lower 4800s
10-Session “volume-weighted” average price magnet:  4785
2026’s Low:  4100 (23 March)
Gold’s Fair Value per Dollar Debasement, (from our opening “Scoreboard”):  3937
The 300-Day Moving Average:  3863 and rising
The 2000’s Triple-Top:  2089 (07 Aug ’20); 2079 (08 Mar’22); 2085 (04 May ’23)
The Gateway to 2000:  1900+
The Final Frontier:  1800-1900
The Northern Front:  1800-1750
On Maneuvers:  1750-1579
The Floor:  1579-1466
Le Sous-sol:  Sub-1466
The Support Shelf:  1454-1434
Base Camp:  1377
The 1360s Double-Top:  1369 in Apr ’18 preceded by 1362 in Sep ’17
Neverland:  The Whiny 1290s
The Box:  1280-1240

So as Gold gathers itself via means reversion, the S&P 500 has made a record high excursion.  But is it really that impressive?  After all, year-to-date Gold is now +11.9%, whereas the S&P is comparably +4.1%.  Still, truth be told, both markets are fundamentally overvalued, Gold per its Fair Value and the S&P by its high (understatement) P/E.  Gold indeed reverted well back down toward Fair Value when price plummeted to 4100 just this past 23 March, (Fair Value then 3890).  But what about for the S&P?  How far would price have to fall to bring the present dividend yield of 1.127% up to match the aforementioned T-Bill’s 3.600%?  We put the question to “AI” (“Assembled Inaccuracy”), which responded thus:

  • “Based on recent market data as of mid-April 2026, the S&P 500 would need to fall approximately 4,586 points to increase the dividend yield from 1.127% to 3.600%.”

Naturally, we followed-up with the math to find ‘twould be an S&P 500 “correction” of -64% to 2540 — right in the heart as below marked of the extrapolated “had COVID not occurred” red regression channel … just in case you’re scoring at home:

Query:  How are those Gold n’ Silver holdings workin’ out for ya?

Cheers!

…m…

17 April 2026 – 08:43 Central Euro Time

Presently, all eight BEGOS Markets are within their respective Neutral Zones for today, and session volatility is very light. The Bond (currently 113^20) yesterday moved under Market Profile support (114^06 now resistance) and price slid below the Market Magnet (114^01); nonetheless, by its Market Trend, the Bond’s linreg is positive and improving upside consistency given the rising “Baby Blues”. Gold again has been recording a comparatively narrow week; the yellow metal’s EDTR (see Market Ranges) has compressed from 196 points two weeks ago to now 140 points; further insight per tomorrow’s 857th consecutive Saturday Edition of The Gold Update. Nothing is due for the Econ Baro until next Tuesday. And Q1 Earnings Season for the S&P 500 is off to a well above-average start: of the 26 constituents having thus far reported, 22 (85%) have bettered their quarterly year-over-year bottom lines; problematic is that the nominal level of earnings is too low to support an S&P here at 7041, given the “live” (futs-adj’d) P/E of 47.8x.

16 April 2026 – 08:44 Central Euro Time

The S&P settled above 7000 yesterday at a record closing high of 7023, (intra-day 7026); the “live” (futs-adj’d) P/E is now 47.6x and the yield 1.126%, (that for the 3mo T-Bill annualized is 3.612%). At present for the BEGOS Markets, both Silver and Copper are above today’s Neutral Zones, the balance of the bunch being within same; session volatility is again light. By Market Values, the Spoo (in real-time) is +327 points above its smooth valuation line; the MoneyFlow for the S&P has notably improved so far this week; however by our broadest measure (63 days, i.e. one quarter), the Flow finds the Index +607 points too high. Cac volume for Oil has rolled from May into that for June with priced discounted by -2.80 points. And the Econ Baro completes its early week with metrics including April’s Philly Fed Index and March’s IndProd/CapUtil.

15 April 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

Presently, Oil is the only BEGOS Market outside (below) its Neutral Zone for today; session volatility is light. Copper in recent days has regained the 6 handle: currently 6.0950, the red metal’s all-time high of 6.5830 was set this past 29 January; by Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, Copper’s Parabolics on the 15mn, 30mn, and 1hr time frames are topping its list. Gold is moving closer to its BEGOS Market Value of 4975, price at present 4839. The S&P 500 yesterday reached up to 6969, the all-time high being 7002 (28 January): the Index has rapidly become extremely “textbook overbought” having just been oversold from 06 March through 02 April and the MoneyFlow having been weak, (although that for yesterday was firm). The Econ Baro looks to April’s NY State Empire Index and NAHB Housing Index, plus March’s Ex/Im Prices. Then late in the session comes the Fed’s Tan Tome.

14 April 2026 – 08:41 Central Euro Time

Silver is at present the sole BEGOS Market outside (above) its Neutral Zone for today; session volatility is quite light. The Euro yesterday confirmed settling above its BEGOS Market Value for the first time since 29 January, the Dollar Index having in recent days fallen from the 100s into the 98s; our top Market Rhythm by pure swing consistency for the Euro on a 10-test basis is its 30mn MACD, whilst on a 24-test basis the Euro’s two standout studies are its 30mn Moneyflow and 2hr Parabolics. At Market Trends, we’ve now positively-sloped linregs for the Bond, Euro, Copper, Oil and the Spoo; thus negatively-sloped are the linregs for the Swiss Franc, Gold and Silver. The Econ Baro awaits March’s PPI, (which by annualizing the consensus expectation is expected to run well above the Fed’s +2.0% target).

13 April 2026 – 08:43 Central Euro Time

Given the failure of the U.S./Iran talks, ’twas no surprise to see — save for Oil — the seven other BEGOS Markets drop at today’s open: at present, the Bond, EuroCurrencies, Silver and Spoo are below today’s Neutral Zones, (Gold and Copper actually are within same), and Oil of course is well-up, currently +8.4% at 103.64. Despite the on-balance negative start to the day, session volatility is to this point light-to-moderate. The Gold Update cites price’s range as “narrowing”, but the stance of inflation as “harrowing”, such that the Fed in due course this year may have to raise rates. The Econ Baro starts a moderate week of incoming data with March’s Existing Home Sales. And Q1 Earnings Season enters its second week, the financials getting the emphasis.

The Gold Update: No. 856 – (11 April 2026) – “Gold Range Narrowing; Inflation Gauge Harrowing”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 856th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 11 April 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

Gold Range Narrowing; Inflation Gauge Harrowing

With all the global uncertainty in play — from unrepayable debt and overvalued (understatement) equities, to stymied transport of the world’s economic engine (oil) and sorrowfully childish warring (“He bombed me, so I’m gonna bomb him!”) — the trading range of Gold, which as we detailed a week ago had through Q1 been “vehemently volatile”, is now noticeably narrowing.  This perhaps is due in part to an allowance of ships through the infamous Strait, as well as 14th-century minds (all ’round) now attempting 21st-century negotiations.  On verra…

“But the trading range still is pretty wide, huh, mmb…

Broadly, Squire, Gold’s ranginess indeed can still be characterized as “wide”, yet of late clearly compressing, as too is that for Silver.  Here from a year ago-to-date per the website are the EDTRs (“expected daily trading ranges”) for Gold on the left and for Silver on the right, both well off their respective peaks of recent weeks; (again for you WestPalmBeachers down there, this is not price, rather the expected range thereto from day-to-day):

“But with prices up so much from a year ago, how about by percentage instead of points, mmb?”

Squire, by either method, precious metals’ volatility today is essentially double that of a year ago, yet as noted, remarkably reduced from the recent price-spiking in February.  To wit this table (in reverse chronological order):

The “point” is:  with all that is in play these days, the daily trade of both Gold and Silver has become a bit more contained, even if considerable vis-à-vis this time in 2025.

Still, as we turn to Gold’s weekly bars and parabolic trends from a year ago-to-date, notwithstanding a fourth rightmost red Short dot, price has posted both “higher highs” and “higher lows” for two consecutive weeks in perceivably pursuing a return to the ascending dashed trendline.  This past week’s low-to-high range of +262 points (+5.7%) ranks narrowest of the past four, despite its expected weekly trading range having anticipated a span of 369 points:

Price too has been recovering relative to its BEGOS Market Value, which as initially depicted in the opening Scoreboard and as below labeled at 5086, is in decline even as Gold settled yesterday (Friday) at 4771, but still -315 points under its smooth valuation line:

‘Course, that’s been a significant improvement given Gold just back on 26 March was a record -886 points (-16.8%) below said valuation.  But more broadly (again per the Scoreboard) Gold today at 4771 is +21.3% overvalued given Fair Value of 3934.  Although Gold through its many “discarded relic” years overwhelmingly went unnoticed, today we oft are asked “Is this a good time to buy Gold?”, our “off-the record” response being, “Now is fine, but purposely budget to purchase again upon price returning to Fair Value.” Reference as well Stephanie Quayle “We Buy Gold” –[’21] as we below go to Gold’s two-panel graphic of the daily bars from three months ago-to-date at left and 10-day Market Profile at right.  Note the baby blue dots of regression trend consistency continuing to climb:  upon their eclipsing the 0% axis, such trend shall have rotated from negative to positive.  And by the Profile, Gold’s most immediate support zone runs from 4787 down to 4691:

Quite similar is the drill for Silver, although having settled the week at 76.03 finds her a distant +33.9% above Fair Value of 56.77.  But as with Gold, Silver’s “Baby Blues” (below left) are rising as her trend becomes less negative, whilst per her Profile (below right) she appears supported down to 72.90.  “As overvalued as you are, Sweet Sister Silver, we still love you!”

Now:  recall the late, great, heavily Brooklyn-accented Joan Rivers?  “Kin we tawk??” … in this case about inflation.  Throughout the past two years, we’ve regularly herein displayed our monthly summaries of inflation, time and again citing its rate stubbornly running above the Federal Reserve’s desired annualized target of +2.0%.  And yet across all those many months has come the usual FinMedia speculation of “How many times will the Fed cut this year?”  Thus rolls on the Investing Age of Stoopid wherein actually performing math has become comprehensively replaced by people parroting what everybody else says and posts.  But has the time now finally arrived to “pay the piper”, (i.e. raise rates)?  Here’s our inflation table for February, now sporting the most over-extended “above target” paces in recent years.  And that’s pre-war, Folks:

But wait, there’s more:  warringly exacerbated by disruption to “the free flow of Oil at market prices” (hat-tip RHL), the “headline” release yesterday by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Consumer Price Index for March of +0.9% was its fastest monthly inflation pace in nearly four years, (since the +1.3% reading for June in 2022 as markets accelerated back to work post-COVID).  However, assuming that neither do you drive nor eat, the “core” release was again just +0.2%.  (Relieved?)

‘Course, the Fed’s stance to cut its FundsRate had been rooted in weak employment data.  But as we know from a week ago, the StateSide jobs picture for March improved well-beyond consensus expectation.  And even as the Economic Barometer took a bit of a dip this past week with just four of its 15 incoming metrics having improved period-over-period, the Baro’s overall strength from July a year ago combined with the ever-more harrowing inflation data well-suits the Fed for a rate rise instead.  The next Open Market Committee Policy Statement is due 13 trading days hence on 29 April, but expect a lot of geo-political play and effect in the balance.  Meanwhile, here’s our year-over-year Econ Baro view:

And specific to the practically yieldless S&P 500, is the average investor about to step off the price cliff, or be willing to pay $44.60 for something that “earns” $1?  If you follow our leading MoneyFlow page, you know just how weak is the Flow, lacking on balance very little “go”, despite a “cease-fire” bump as below shown.  For by the broadest MoneyFlow measure (the right-hand panel’s cumulation from three months ago-to-date), the S&P “ought be” some -700 points lower than its current 6817 price.  But as usual, it takes time for the investing community to figure that out…

…and hardly shall the now underway Q1 Earnings Season find bottom lines for the S&P having doubled, (which for those of you scoring at home would halve the price/earnings ratio to a more realistic level).  Fortunately with Gold, you’ll always be on the right level!

“Oh now yer really ‘tawkin’, mmb!

Absolutely, Squire.

Cheers!

…m…

10 April 2026 – 08:38 Central Euro Time

As we saw ’round this time yesterday, trading in the BEGOS Markets is quite narrow, all eight components at present within today’s Neutral Zones and volatility is very light, albeit in the context that trading ranges have expanded significantly in recent months. Yesterday’s PCE data for February was not Fed-friendly as we’ll further display in tomorrow’s 856th consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. The leading MoneyFlow for the S&P 500 cautiously suggests lower levels are ahead: by our page thereto, on the one-week basis the Index “ought be” -91 points lower than ’tis (currently 6825), on the one-month basis -139 points lower, and on the one-quarter basis a more dire -807 points lower; as trading/investing entities start to sense this going forward, it can pressure prices. The Econ Baro wraps the week with April’s UofM Sentiment Survey, March’s CPI and Treasury Deficit, plus February’s Factory Orders.

09 April 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

“Quiet” is the watchword for the BEGOS Markets thus far, all eight at present within their respective Neutral Zones for today; session volatility is exceptionally light. That noted, there still exist some near-term valuation extremes are we go ’round the horn for the Market Values of the five primary BEGOS components, where in real-time we’ve: the Bond -3^19 points “low” below its smooth valuation line, the Euro -0.015 points “low”, Gold -377 points “low”, Oil +13.79 points “high” and the Spoo -67 points “low”. Yesterday’s net -12.5% drop in Oil was sufficient to confirm price settling below its Market Magnet of 101.50, (currently price 97.52). Yesterday’s MoneyFlow into the S&P 500 was not fully supportive of the +2.5% up move, such leading indicator instead (regressed into S&P points) being +1.7%. The Econ Baro awaits metrics including the “Fed-favoured” PCE data for February, plus that month’s Personal Income/Spending and Wholesale Inventories, as well as the final revision to Q4 GDP.

08 April 2026 – 08:48 Central Euro Time

Suspension for two weeks of the war sees Oil down as much as -17.5% from last evening’s settle, current price 94.80 and below its Neutral Zone for today; above same are all the seven other BEGOS Markets, and session volatility (not surprisingly) is mostly robust. The Dollar Index is down more than -1% for third time year-to-date; the EuroCurrencies thus are getting a strong bid, the Euro itself by Market Trends finding its linreg having rotated from negative to positive, (that for the Swiss Franc lagging in such respect). Gold up to 4888 is nearly a three-week high: recall that Gold by its BEGOS Market Value has been deeply oversold, such real-time reading still finding price -285 points below its smooth valuation line. And the Spoo is firm such that were the S&P 500 to open at this instant, ‘twould so do +2.7%. Whilst nothing is due today for the Econ Baro, late in the session we’ve the FOMC 17/18 March meeting minutes.

07 April 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

Oil is the sole BEGOS Market at present outside (above) today’s Neutral Zone; session volatility to this point is light. By their Market Profiles, the Bond, Swiss Franc and Spoo all moved yesterday above their most volume-dominant prices for the past 10 trading days, whilst Silver dropped below same, albeit today there so far lacks much continued direction. Looking at our best Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency: on a 10-test basis we’ve Gold’s 2hr Parabolics, Copper’s 6hr Moneyflow and the Euro’s 1hr Parabolics; on a 24-test basis the leaders are Copper’s 15mn Parabolics, the non-BEGOS Yen’s 30mn Price Oscillator and the Euro’s 30mn Moneyflow. The Econ Baro awaits February’s Durable Orders, plus late in the session that month’s Consumer Credit. And Q1 Earnings Season is officially underway: for Q4, 71% (an above-average pace) of S&P 500 reporting constituents bettered their bottom line of Q4 a year earlier.

06 April 2026 – 08:49 Central Euro Time

‘Tis Easter Monday on this side of The Pond, but StateSide ’tis a full trading day for the BEGOS Markets, for which at present we’ve Copper as the sole component outside (below) its Neutral Zone for today; session volatility is light. The Gold Update underscores the yellow metal’s record Q1 price volatility, overwhelming that which we’ve seen across the prior 25 years. And whilst by Market Trends the linregs remain negative for all of the BEGOS except Oil, the “Baby Blues” of trend consistency are rising notably for the Metals Triumvirate, the Bond and Spoo. The Econ Baro has a very busy week of 15 incoming metrics, including February’s “Fed-favoured” PCE data (Thursday) such that we’ll complete our inflation table through that month. Today for the Baro comes March’s ISM(Svc) Index.

The Gold Update: No. 855 – (04 April 2026) – “The Vehement Volatility of Gold”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 855th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 04 April 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

The Vehement Volatility of Gold

One quarter (plus two days) of the 2026 trading year is in the books, replete with really record-setting Q1 volatility for Gold, price having settled its week on Thursday at 4703 as we above see.

For an otherwise “non-yielding, archaic, ho-hum” hard currency, Gold in Q1 traced a record -1,486 point-range from the recent All-Time High of 5586 (29 January) down to 4100 (23 March), indeed a -26.6% plummet across a mere 37 trading days.  Comparably, this century’s second-largest Q1 trading range was +537 points (+20.5%) just a year ago; or second-best percentage-wise, Gold in 2009 amassed a +25.7% low-to-high Q1 run, (albeit by points ’twas “only” +206 from 802 to 1008).

Yet through such rampant Q1 volatility for 2026, we’ve this amazing view from the ” ‘Tis Far Too Early to Blow One’s Own Horn Dept. “

“Oh no, here yer gonna gloat, mmb…

Now just relax, Squire, and instead recall this opening sentence from our first missive of 2026 (03 January) which read as follows:

  • 5546 is our forecast Gold high for 2026.”

‘Twas then followed a number of paragraphs deeper into the piece by:

  • “… the potential low coming in at 4136 …”

Here is daily Gold year-to-date (63 trading days); duly note therein the labeled green and red lines:

“Yeah but ya gotta think that range is gonna get busted, mmb…

“Think” is your key word there, Squire.  Unknowns abound with 75% of the trading year still in the balance.  To wit:  next week’s busy economic calendar shall complete our inflation data for February and it doesn’t look Fed-favorable one wit.  Energy prices are on the move to the extent we see the FinMedia (finally) having figured out the Federal Reserve may actually have to raise rates as the year unfolds.  “Whoopsie!”  There’s your Gold negative for lower lows, albeit as we’ve historically herein shown, Gold can rise in stride with rates, (recall 2004-2006).  ‘Course if instead money need be created by the Fed to pay back that to which the U.S. has been lent, there’s your Gold positive for higher highs: recall our close from two missives ago:

  • ” What if — to pay off the StateSide federal debt of now $39T — the Fed merely made an accounting entry of same … the ‘M2’ money supply would leap 2.7x from today’s $22T to some $61T … [and Gold would be] at 10,606 (by Fair Value precision) … ‘Got Gold?’ “

Moving right along… we just mentioned energy, which given the war has knocked the precious metals from their long-running spot atop our BEGOS Markets Standings.  Here’s the table year-to-date, (and no, that percentage gain for Oil is not a typo):

Still, both Gold and Silver are on the podium.  But clearly the S&P 500 being -3.8% is certain to cause chaotic confusion for the “stocks only go up” crowd.  The chilling news for such “marked-to-market millionaires” is that across the past 50 years, (which for you WestPalmBeachers down there is from 1976 through 2025), the S&P has netted 24% (i.e.12 years) that were negative … but there’s been only one down year in the past seven.  Think the S&P is overwhelmingly due for a down year, or two?  Reprise Murray Head from back in ’75: “Say it ain’t so, Joe”.  Have a great day.

To be sure, Gold’s days are vehemently volatile, indeed as are its weeks per the following year-over-year graphic.  The expected weekly trading range for Gold is now 369 points, the daily alone being 196 points.  Either way — of which there’s been a lot — the red parabolic Short trend has completed a third dot.  But at least Gold’s four-week losing streak is complete, this past week’s +4.7% gain a welcome treat.  Moreover, Gold is still “textbook oversold” through the past 13 trading days; that would resolve upon Gold swiftly closing above 4797.  ‘Course, by the opening Scoreboard, Gold is nearly -10% below its BEGOS Market Value (5220), but ’tis practically +20% above Fair Value (3930).

Let’s stay year-over-year in going to our graphic of Gold’s percentage track vis-à-vis those of key metals’ equities.  Thus from this time a year ago, Gold has gained +49%, whereas for the leverage-driven equities we find Franco-Nevada (FNV) +64%, Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) +93%, the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners exchange-traded fund (GDX) +107%, Pan American Silver (PAAS) +118%, Newmont (NEM) +136%, and the Global X Silver Miners exchange-traded fund (SIL) +137%.  Quite the roller coaster for the equities boaster!

The precious metals’ wild ride is further exemplified by our 10-day Market Profiles for Gold on the left and for Silver on the right, both boasting a big bracket gap.  Just a friendly reminder that gravity does work:

Whereas the above Profiles encompass this last fortnight, let’s too go ’round the horn across the past month by the daily bars for each of our BEGOS Markets.  Notice that — again save for Oil — the balance of the bunch have negatively-sloped grey regression trend lines.  Also, as regular website viewers know, the baby blue dots depict the consistency of the respective trends.  And per the maxim “Follow the Blues instead of the news, else lose yer shoes”, the rising “Baby Blues” for both Gold and Silver are indicative of their respective downtrends becoming less consistently so as the trendlines become more shallow.  We thus may see still higher metals’ prices in the ensuing week:

Now again, it being month-end, ’tis our own trend to present Gold by its monthly bars since 2020.  And per “March, the Mad Scientist” by Jethro Tull from 50 years ago, this past March for the Gold bulls was maddening.  ‘Tis the second right-most “candle”, which as jarringly red as it appears, finished March well off the aforementioned 4100 low.  Then the right-most wee “doji” is this April’s two trading days pro tanto, (a little Latin lingo there).  Here’s the whole show:

As for the Economic Barometer — on balance in ascent since last July — ’twasn’t too much of a surprise yesterday (Friday) to see the best Non-Farm Payrolls creation since March a year ago.  ‘Course, the growing economy in tandem with increasing prices doesn’t auger well for a FedFunds rate cut anytime soon, with instead perhaps (as noted) a rate rise should energy prices further fuel inflation.  On this side of the pond, petrol is getting pretty pricey.  We’re told that just down the coast in San Remo, its four filling stations went dry last week.  Meanwhile StateSide, the past week’s stream of 13 incoming Econ Baro metrics found eight having improved period-over-period, notably including (in addition to March’s job growth) February’s Retail Sales.  Here’s the picture from a year ago-to-date, the Baro in blue and S&P 500 in red, (and as earlier shown, year-to-date in the red):

All that said, next week is the commencement of Q1 Earnings Season.  You’ll recall those for Q4 found 71% of the S&P’s reporting constituents having improved their bottom lines from the like quarter a year earlier.  Can such above average pace be maintained?  The Baro suggests yes, but an ongoing energy crisis can eventually erode earnings.  ‘Course as we oft quip, if earnings today were properly used as an equities’ valuation tool, the S&P would be half its current level, (the current price/earnings ratio still a whoppingly high 43.5x).  But:  ’tis different these days (until ’tisn’t).

In the meantime — for those of you scoring at home — the S&P 500 (pre-yield) is +399% century-to-date (or with yield, nearly +500%); the yieldless relic — vehemently volatile Gold — is +1,618%.

So what’s in your bunny basket?

Cheers!

…m…

03 April 2026 – 08:39 Central Euro Time

As noted yesterday, whilst today is a holiday for western bourses, because of the exceptional occurrence of this Good Friday falling on the first Friday of the month when StateSide Payrolls are released, the Bond, Currencies and Spoo are in abbreviated trading sessions such that they can respond to the data; none of those BEGOS Markets have (as yet) moved materially. Tomorrow brings the 855th consecutive Saturday Edition of The Gold Update, indeed our month and quarter-ending piece. Happy Easter!

02 April 2026 – 08:21 Central Euro Time

‘Tis the final trading day of the week, wherein at present — save for Oil being above its Neutral Zone for today — we’ve nothing but red for the seven other BEGOS Markets, all below said Zones; session volatility is mostly robust following the U.S.’ intent to ramp up war operations toward completion. As provisionally noted yesterday, both the Bond and Gold have now confirmed their “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency having crossed above the key -80% axis: however both markets are well down today (Bond -0.8%, Gold -3.8%). Looking at Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency, our leaders (10-test basis) are Copper’s 6hr Moneyflow and both Gold’s 12hr Parabolics and 1hr Price Oscillator; too, (24-test basis), we’ve the non-BEGOS Yen’s 15mn Moneyflow, Gold’s 2hr Moneyflow and Silver’s 30mn Parabolics. Today’s Econ Baro incoming metrics include February’s Trade Deficit. Whilst western bourses are closed tomorrow, we’ll nonetheless have a brief comment, noting that StateSide Payrolls shall be reported, for which the Bond, EuroCurrencies and Spoo have an abbreviated Friday session so as to respond to the data.

01 April 2026 – 08:35 Central Euro Time

Yesterday’s +2.9% net gain in the S&P 500 was the largest since 13 May a year ago (+3.3%); that for Gold of +4.2% was the most since 03 February (+6.2%). At present, the Bond, EuroCurrencies and Spoo are above their respective Neutral Zones for today; the balance of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and session volatility is light-to-moderate. By Market Trends, yesterday both Silver and Copper confirmed their “Baby Blues” of linreg consistency having moved above their key -80% axes, indicative of still higher prices near-term; today, the Blues for Gold have provisionally moved up above same. Oil (98.36) has traded down to just above its most volume-dominant Market Profile price of 98.00. Scheduled metrics for the Econ Baro are March’s ADP employment data and ISM(Mfg) Index, February’s Retail Sales, and January’s Business Inventories.

31 March 2026 – 08:42 Central Euro Time

The final trading day of Q1 finds at present the Bond, Gold, Silver and the Spoo above today’s Neutral Zones; Oil is below same, and BEGOS Markets’ volatility is again moderate. The Bond yesterday moved above what had been volume-dominant Market Profile resistance (112^22), price now a full above above that at 113^22; similarly, Copper moved above same (5.470) to now 5.509; both markets however — as remains the case for every BEGOS component except Oil — are in negative linreg (see Market Trends). Gold (presently 4591) is just beneath its most volume-dominant Market Profile resistor of 4598; too Gold is still considerably below its BEGOS Market Value of 5243, that measure itself having begun to roll over to the downside. The Econ Baro awaits March’s Chi PMI and Consumer Confidence.

30 March 2026 – 08:36 Central Euro Time

Into the new week we’ve at present the Bond, Gold and Copper above today’s Neutral Zones; the balance of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and session volatility is moderate. The Gold Update depicts price as being (by percentage) about equidistant (i.e. “♫ Stuck in the Middle with Gold ♫” between its BEGOS Market Value (some +14% higher than price) and its Fair Value (some -14% lower than price). As to our Market Values for all five primary BEGOS Components (in real-time): we’ve the Bond as -6^30 points “low” beneath its smooth valuation line, the Euro as -0.050 points “low”, Gold as -729 points “low”, Oil as +26.58 points “high”, and the Spoo as -620 points “low”. The Econ Baro is quiet today ahead of 14 incoming scheduled as the week unfolds.

The Gold Update: No. 854 – (28 March 2026) – “♫ Stuck in the Middle with Gold ♫”

The Gold Update by Mark Mead Baillie — 854th Edition — Monte-Carlo — 28 March 2026 (published each Saturday) — www.deMeadville.com

♫ Stuck in the Middle with Gold ♫

In two trading-days time, 2026 shall be 25% complete.  And as was calculated back at New Year, our expected yearly trading range for Gold in 2026 came to 1410 points between the low and high.  Or by percentage range, were the low to come first, the high would later be +34.1% above the low, else if vice-versa, the low -25.4% below the high, (the latter directionally being the case year-to-date).

But so far through not quite three months, the range has already surpassed our expectation in spanning 1486 points, or -26.6%,  from the 29 January high of 5586 down to the 23 March low of 4100.  More on Gold’s extremes vis-à-vis what we had precisely forecast come next Saturday’s month-end/quarter-end piece; (a shameless plug, that).

To be sure, from the “Means Reversion Dept.” — barring your having slept through last Monday’s trading session — that day’s low of 4100 was a “mere” +5.4% (+210 points) above Fair Value of then 3890.  We say “mere” as by Gold’s All-Time High of 5586, price at that instant was +43.0% (+1681 points) above Fair Value of then 3905; (the latter has since slipped a tad given the immaterially periodic refining of the money supply).

Either way, in settling the week yesterday (Friday) at 4490, Gold per the above opening Scoreboard is now fundamentally +14.4% (+564 points) above Fair Value, but technically is nearly an identical -14.6% (-770 points) below its BEGOS Market Value.  Cue “Stuck in the Middle with You” –[Stealers Wheel, ’72].  Cue, too, Gold’s year-over-year track and — just now rolling over — smooth BEGOS valuation line per our proprietary view:

More commonly used by the investing/trading community at large are “textbook technicals”, our preferred cocktail comprised of John Bollinger’s Bands, blended with Relative Strength and infused with Stochastics.  And such concoction now finds Gold as “textbook oversold” through the past nine trading days.

“But there’s new contract premium coming in, right mmb?

Certainly so, Squire, as contract volume on Gold is rolling from April into June which adds +33 points of fresh premium to price (by the so-called “continuous contract”) as we go into next week.

‘Course such premium gets lost in the shuffle given just how broad Gold’s trading ranges have become:  price’s expect daily trading range is now 193 points (updated nightly at the website), and the weekly is expected to trace 359 points.

That’s a lot of points.  For example:  to trade one COMEX Gold contract (by which you control 100 ounces of Gold) today requires initial margin of just $31,671; (for you WestPalmBeachers down there, that is called “leverage”).  In the new week — assuming the range were to work out with your impossibly being perfectly price prescient in buying the exact low and selling the exact high (or vice-versa, albeit as we always say “Shorting Gold is a bad idea”) — you’d gain +359 points valued at $100/point, i.e. +$35,900 … which added to your initial margin would thus increase your account by +113% to $67,571.  That’s within one week, just in case you’re scoring at home.  (Disclaimer:  get it backward and you shan’t be around anymore).

What hasn’t been around for some time in The Gold Update is one of our infamous pop quizzes.  So let’s go with one.  Ready?

  • Gold just completed a fourth consecutive down week.  When was the last time that happened?  Extra credit:  What is Gold’s largest weekly down streak so far this century?

“The last time, mmb, was in February 2023, right?

Correct you are, Squire.  And the for the extra credit?

“Ummm … there’ve been three streaks of seven weeks each in ’04, ’15 and ’16, yes?

Folks, this is why Squire got the job.  Spot on, mate.  But let us not procrastinate, as we move on to the weekly bars from one year ago-to-date — which of late have not been looking so great — even as price  yesterday settled well off the week’s low:

 

Yet, as therein noted, Gold’s fourth consecutive down week was only a loss of -2 points, as from the 4100 low, price bounced back to now 4490.  Still, the distance from here to the ensuing week’s parabolic “flip-to-Long” price of 5527 requires a rise of +1037 points, nearly triple the expected weekly trading range (359 points).  So realistically, the current red-dotted parabolic Short trend likely has at least a few more weeks to run.

Toward choosing a technical study for Gold, from the “Benefit of Hindsight Dept.”, the website’s Market Rhythms page currently depicts 28 studies (of 45 tested nightly) which meet the list’s qualifications.  The best of that bunch up to now (through 10 tests) are Gold’s daily Parabolics:  as the last 10 signals have alternated back and forth between Long and Short (careful), each trade “would have” achieved a minimum of 48 points of profit.  ‘Course, you’re on your own with Market Rhythms as again, ’tis all in hindsight.  Still, the webpage encompassing all our BEGOS Market Rhythms is updated each night.

Updated daily as well is the Economic Barometer, for which the past week was fairly muted:  the Baro collected just eight incoming metrics of which three bettered their respective prior period.  Positively, the StateSide Current Account Deficit for Q4 ($190.7B) was the lowest since COVID-stricken Q1 for 2021.  As for the Baro’s weak link from last week, ’twas Q4’s Productivity revision from +2.8% down to +1.8%; (our ever-productive Squire hates it when that happens).  Here it all is from a year ago-to-date, ahead of 14 metrics due for next week’s slate:

Therein too we see the S&P 500 which from its record high of 7002 (28 January) is today at 6369,  a rather mild correction of -9%, and yet the price/earnings ratio is a ridiculously high 42.2x.  ‘Course to market “newbies” and the children’s writing pools of the FinMedia, this recent sag is a cataclysmic crash.  Therefore toward maintaining perspective, here is our updated chart of the S&P 500 across the past 50 years:  note the current rightmost “world-ending” down hook.  To be sure, war-elicited lack of energy can severely put the screws into the economy, meaning lower corporate earnings.  Oh yes, ’tis been a good number of years since earnings were actually regarded as a valuation tool for equities.  But perhaps the effects of the war shall bring common sense back to pricing, which per the following graphic would be between the yellow regression channel lines, (for as you well know, everything ultimately reverts to the mean):

Meanwhile, let us drill down into Gold.  Here we’ve the following two-panel graphic of the yellow metal’s daily bars from three months ago-to-date on the left and 10-day Market Profile (by June contract pricing) on the right.  Query:  when Gold’s baby blue dots of regression trend consistency broke below +80% (price wildly overvalued up there), did you (to quote charter reader THR) “take a few chippies off the table”?  In looking at the Profile, we see nearby support for Gold as labeled at 4457 with resistance at 4598:

We’ve heard quite a bit of banter this past week about buying Gold sub-4000.  But you know how that goes:  whilst all await such desired level, price never gets there.  That said, although a return by Gold to Fair Value (now 3926, itself in ascent these past nine weeks) would be an attractive entry/add level, we reprise the great Richard Russell:  “There’s never a bad time to buy Gold!”

As to “poor ol’ Sister Silver” we can say the same as regards her “Baby Blues” (below left), their having broken the +80% axis back on 02 February.  And by her Profile (below right), now priced at 69.77, the white metal is basically at her most volume-dominant level of the past fortnight (69.70 as labeled).  As for Silver’s Fair Value?  Per the opening Scoreboard she’s presently +23.2% above such 56.65 level:

So there we have it:  Gold today at 4490 is nearly equidistant between its BEGOS Market Value (5260) which has just begun to descend, and its Fair Value (3926) which is in ascent.  So as to where Gold travels near-term, whilst fundamentals remain the ultimate driver of price, the swifter technicals are negative in many respects.  As noted earlier for guidance, Gold’s best trading studies are comprehensively tested every night in order to qualify at our Market Rhythms page.  Regardless, as herein emphasized, Gold is basically at the midpoint between our two critically important valuation metrics.  But in this case, being stuck in the middle clearly is good (dare we say) “Fortuna”!

Cheers!

…m…

27 March 2026 – 08:34 Central Euro Time

The Bond currently is below its Neutral Zone for today, whilst above same are all three element of the Metals Triumvirate; session volatility for the BEGOS Markets is again light. Gold’s cac volume is rolling from April into that for June with +33 points of fresh premium; more on Gold, ‘natch, in tomorrow’s 854th consecutive Saturday edition of The Gold Update. The Spoo yesterday moved below its most volume-dominant price (6639) for the past fortnight (see Market Profiles); as fundamentally expensive as is the S&P 500 (“live” futs-adj’d P/E 43.2x), the Index is “textbook oversold” through the last 15 trading days and the Spoo itself is (in real-time) -514 points below its smooth valuation line (see Market Values). The Econ Baro wraps its quiet week with the March revision to the UofM Sentiment Survey.

26 March 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

The Bond, Gold and Silver all are presently below their respective Neutral Zones for today; the balance of the BEGOS Markets are within same, and session volatility is light. The Swiss Franc by its Market Profile yesterday moved below what had been volume-dominant support at 1.280: price is now 1.273; by Market Trends, as is the case for every BEGOS component except for Oil, the Swiss Franc and Euro are in negative linreg, but both are becoming less consistently down as the Dollar Index keeps falling back from the 100 level (currently 99.515). The S&P 500 is basically down -6% from its all-time high (7002): however by our MoneyFlow page, the Index (6592) “ought be” -95 points lower by the five-day measure, -196 points lower by the 21-day measure, and -737 points lower by the 63-day measure; the “live” P/E of the S&P (futs-adj’d) is 44.3x. Today for the Econ Baro we’ve just the usual Initial Jobless Claims from the prior week.

25 March 2026 – 08:45 Central Euro Time

Both the Swiss Franc and Copper presently are below today’s Neutral Zones, whilst above same is Gold; BEGOS Markets’ volatility is light-to-moderate. Going ’round the horn of Market Values for the five primary BEGOS components, we show (in real-time) the Bond as -7^15 points “low” vis-à-vis its smooth valuation line, the Euro as -0.053 points “low”, Gold as -721 points “low”, Oil as +17.43 points “high” and the Spoo as -451 points “low”. Oil yesterday by Market Trends saw the “Baby Blues” of trend consistency drop below the key +80% axis, indicative of still lower prices near-term: obviously the wildcard in this case is the war; thus a Short is fine, but with a firm stop in line(!); by Oil’s Market Profile, the most volume-dominant price resistor is 94.20, (vs. current price at 88.61). Today’s Econ Baro looks to February’s Ex/Im Prices and Q4’s Current Account Deficit.

24 March 2026 – 08:38 Central Euro Time

No, Gold’s intra-day drop yesterday of -9.6% was not a record; and even as Gold recovered to finish the session just -1.8%, the low trade of the day at precisely 4100 was “only” +210 points above Fair Value of 3890 … just in case you’re scoring at home. At present, Gold is in its Neutral Zone for today, as are six of the other BEGOS Markets, Copper being the sole exception below same; session volatility vis-à-vis yesterday has cooled to moderate. Topping our Market Rhythms for pure swing consistency on a 10-test basis are Silver’s 15mn Moneyflow and 30mn Price Oscillator, plus the Bond’s 30mn Moneyflow; on a 24-test basis, the leaders are Silver’s 2hr Parabolics, the non-BEGOS Yen’s 2hr MACD, and Gold’s 4hr Price Oscillator. The Econ Baro awaits the usual revisions to Q4’s Productivity and Unit Labor costs.